Help CleanTechnica’s work by a Substack subscription, on Patreon, or on Stripe. Assist us produce the entire high-quality, authentic content material we publish week after week regardless of the challenges of content-scraping AI, delinquent media, inflation, and different hurdles.
When you poured rapeseed oil right into a combustion engine and declared it a “zero-emission automobile,” you’d be laughed at. However within the EU Parliament, this fiction is being drafted into legislation.
When you poured rapeseed oil right into a combustion engine, watched poisonous exhaust billow from the tailpipe, and declared it a “zero-emission automobile,” you’d be laughed at. But contained in the corridors of the European Parliament, this actual fiction is being drafted into legislation.
The start of the zombie-engine
Beneath heavy stress from the fossil gasoline foyer and legacy carmakers, EU lawmakers are making ready to endorse a weird new regulatory beast: the VEEF, or “Car Solely working on Eligible Fuels.” In plain English, these are commonplace combustion-engine automobiles promised to run completely on liquid biofuels or e-fuels. In trade for that promise, Brussels plans to grant them a authorized tailpipe emission rating of zero.
It’s regulatory alchemy at its worst. Cloaked within the seductive language of “technological neutrality,” this proposal creates an escape hatch for an out of date expertise, all whereas organising abnormal European drivers for an costly logistical nightmare.
It’s simply one other determined tactic to increase the lifetime of the combustion engine by any means potential.
The reality below the costume: it’s not clear
To know the absurdity of the biofuel automobile, take a look at what truly occurs within the engine. It’s nonetheless the very same combustion. A piston firing on biofuels produces the identical poisonous cocktail of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and wonderful particulates that has choked European cities for many years. Labeling these automobiles “zero-emission” launders the air pollution by a regulatory loophole and continues to foster emission-induced pathology.
Nor does it save the local weather. The common biofuel mix accessible in the present day delivers a modest 20% to 40% emissions saving in comparison with fossil fuels. While you issue within the oblique land-use change of first-generation crop biofuels ploughing up forests to develop meals for engines, crop-based biofuel automobiles truly emit 23% extra greenhouse gases than a normal petrol automobile.
A entice for the common driver
Biofuel automobiles are being offered to the general public below the guise of affordability, but working them is punishingly costly. Hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) biodiesel prices round €13 per 100 kilometers to run, in comparison with roughly €7 for an equal electrical automobile. Pushing drivers towards these automobiles locks households into unstable, excessive gasoline prices on the actual second renewable electrical energy costs and battery prices are tumbling.
Then comes the phantom gasoline drawback. Europe possesses a strictly restricted provide of biofuels. The continent produces solely sufficient superior petrol biofuel to energy roughly a million automobiles.
The Parliament’s compromise envisions permitting food-crop fuels till 2032, earlier than shifting new biofuels fashions to run strictly on superior wastes and residues from 2033 onward. However as a result of gross sales skew closely towards petrol whereas superior biofuels skew towards diesel, the arithmetic collapses instantly. If carmakers promote a million petrol VEEFs cumulatively, European biofuel provides would run dry instantly. Tens of millions of drivers can be left with nowhere to replenish.
A kafkaesque paperwork
How does Brussels suggest to cease a driver from pulling as much as an everyday pump and filling their “zero-emission” automobile with cheaper fossil petrol?
By a bureaucratic and technical monster. The proposals require that producers set up complicated onboard programs to make sure gasoline exclusivity: gasoline sensors, tamper-proof {hardware}, and engine-throttling software program to strand your automobile if the unsuitable liquid is detected. Pumps would require cryptographic digital handshakes with the automobile’s chassis quantity to authorize a fill-up. On high of that, it may require two separate, parallel, continent-wide pump networks; one for pre-2033 crop fuels, one other for post-2033 superior fuels.
For an EU Fee dedicated to deregulation and “simplification,” that is pure loophole-hungry nonsense.
Naturally, the trade is aware of this. The fuel-combustion foyer is already quietly pivoting to their actual purpose: “mass balancing.” Beneath this proposal, carmakers wouldn’t must put pure biofuels into your tank in any respect. As an alternative, by utilizing the usual blended biofuel mixture of in the present day, they might manufacture “digital” clear automobiles, permitting them to maintain promoting soiled combustion engines whereas promoting fewer electrical automobiles.
Europe’s industrial self-sabotage
This isn’t only a technical Eurocrat debate, it’s an industrial fork within the highway. Greater than €200 billion has already been dedicated to constructing Europe’s electrical automobile and battery provide chain. That capital was deployed on the promise of a transparent, secure regulatory path to zero emissions by 2035.
Whereas China dominates the worldwide battery provide chain and electrical automobile gross sales surge worldwide, European policymakers are entertaining a weird scheme to maintain Nineteenth-century expertise on life help.
The VEEF loophole solves no local weather goal or air air pollution, helps no driver, and builds no clear trade. It’s merely a regulatory Computer virus designed to purchase legacy polluters a number of extra years of business-as-usual. When the vote arrives, lawmakers should slam the door shut on this pricey diversion.
In case you are in search of a terrifying Halloween costume, a zombie combustion engine masquerading as zero-emission is about as scary because it will get.
By Lucien Mathieu, T&E
Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and excessive stage summaries, join our day by day publication, and observe us on Google Information!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us right here.
Join our day by day publication for 10–15 new cleantech tales a day. Or join our weekly one on high tales of the week if day by day is simply too frequent.

CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.
CleanTechnica’s Remark Coverage
