Ideas on Tesla–SpaceX Merger — Readers Chime In

Help CleanTechnica’s work via a Substack subscription, on Patreon, or on Stripe. Assist us produce all the high-quality, authentic content material we publish week after week regardless of the challenges of content-scraping AI, delinquent media, inflation, and different hurdles.

I simply wrote yesterday concerning the rising suspicion that Tesla and SpaceX will merge. Regardless of studying and writing about this many instances, although, it’s a bit exhausting to imagine — partially as a result of it’s not clear how merging the businesses would assist anybody.

In response to my article, there have been many good feedback, however a handful of them actually stood out as feedback that would stand on their very own and get extra consideration.

I’ve seen increasingly more headlines about this potential merger, and there’s nearly a way that it’s inevitable. Loads has reportedly gone on behind the scenes to discover the subject, and Musk has chimed in supporting the thought. However, once more, why? What’s the level? How would merging the businesses be helpful? Let’s take a look at what a couple of readers needed to say in answering these questions:

Mark Turner succinctly however fairly insightfully famous: “Musk likes to maneuver the items round. Makes it simpler to spin a brand new story and tougher to research what is de facto occurring.”

Alongside the same line, freedomev postulates the next: “After all he’s going to, as Tesla goes down and desires to make SpaceX overpay, bail him and his traders out identical to with promoting them X, his AI, 1,000s of Cybertrucks.
Tesla’s actual worth is about 10% of $420 if priced like others as an alternative of to this large hype rip-off Musk is operating.”

Matthew2312 mentioned the same factor in several phrases: “That is the final probability to stave off a share value collapse for Tesla on condition that it’s nowhere near assembly any of its enterprise goals or guarantees on robotaxis, car gross sales, photo voltaic, semis, or robotics. It’s good for the Tesla shareholders, horrible for the SpaceX shareholders however guess who has no alternative?”

Matt Fulkerson famous: “So I agree it is not sensible to merge the 2 firms. What does a roadster or Mannequin 3, S, X have in widespread with House X? Completely nothing.

“However let Elon do what he desires, after which let the entire pyramid collapse.”

That line “However let Elon do what he desires” may simply get to the center of the matter, however let’s dig extra into what that would imply.

Auto Motive added the next: “A merger may give Musk entry to a a lot bigger pool of capital for AI, robotics, satellites and space-based computing. It may additionally expose Tesla shareholders to dangers from companies with totally different spending wants and monetary outcomes. Purchaser watch out for Musks endgame. Drain Tesla of money and add mortgage obligations to pay monetary funds to the businesses that haven’t any revenue, money circulation and excessive debt. Crimson flags have been flying over Musks fixations his sociopathic traits of pathological mendacity, he’s all the time proper, belief me with out details, his guarantees of riches with no time line. Many drink the kool assist. Playing addicts pulling the lever again and again.”

Hmm, some attention-grabbing ideas.

Right here’s one other take with a novel however probably correct angle, from Defendor:

“The reason being to offer Musk absolute management over Tesla like he has over SpaceX.

“Proper now Tesla not less than has to theoretically be involved about shareholders as they might probably vote towards one thing, and so they have regular voting rights the place their votes rely as a lot as Musk’s vote.

“However SpaceX has decreased widespread share voting rights to 1/10 of insider shares like Musk holds. Thus Musk has over 80% voting management over SpaceX. What widespread shareholders vote doesn’t matter in any respect.

“As soon as Tesla is acquired, they are going to be a part of that construction…”

Lastly alongside this prepare of thought, for now, right here’s an attention-grabbing thought from Nathan Canolee: “I see the merger is an insurance coverage coverage for Musk and his firms, none of which has [anything] to do with SpaceX. SpaceX has many authorities contracts, it’s a strategic firm for US authorities and too huge to fail. You all understand how the remaining will work. Taxpayers will foot the invoice whereas Musk will get richer.”

There are a number of attention-grabbing takes there, with overlap and complementary concepts in addition to a couple of distinctive views. Some readers did have very totally different opinions on the matter, although. Ole Laursen had this to say:

“Cause for the merger: Tesla is constructing a huge manufacturing unit for producing AI chips that SpaceX must construct an enormous knowledge heart in area.

“So far as I can inform, the merger talks on-line began heating up when this was clear.

“For all of the snark on Musk on this website, the dude went from having a considerably ailing AI firm/division to fairly exceptional income in a couple of months.”

I’m unsure why the businesses would want to merge simply because considered one of them is constructing one thing the opposite desires (that’s simply regular enterprise, no?). I do get it that speaking concerning the firms merging obtained a lot stronger when this grew to become information, however I don’t see why Tesla wouldn’t simply promote AI chips to SpaceX whereas it continues with its different, fully unrelated consumer-oriented enterprise. concerning getting cash on the AI enterprise, Dan Allard responded:

“AI Overview

“Grok and its dad or mum AI phase (housed beneath SpaceX/xAI) generate important income however function at a internet loss as a result of large capital expenditure and infrastructure prices.

“You must do your homework earlier than posting. Don’t put income in the identical sentence as AI these firms all function at a loss immediately.”

Certainly. There’s additionally all the dialogue round an enormous potential AI bubble that we and others have written and talked about at size. Nobody has demonstrated how AI software program firms are going to make a revenue, and the AI {hardware} firms are simply the suppliers for these large AI software program firms. If the software program firms collapse, or the bubble pops, the {hardware} firms will probably be hit exhausting as effectively. SpaceX/xAI as a software program firm is seeing a lot much less demand than it anticipated, even with its dramatically sponsored low value, and if others cease utilizing its {hardware}, that facet of the enterprise is in disastrous form as effectively.

There’s lots there to digest and talk about additional. I’m curious to see what else individuals must say and the place the concepts — and eventual actuality — go from there.