What is the Standing of Class Motion Lawsuit on Tesla Full Self Driving?

Help CleanTechnica’s work by means of a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

Regardless of masking Tesla intently for nearly a decade and a half, some tales sneak by means of. I assumed Tesla had “gotten away with it” up till now with reference to very deceptive advertising and claims round Tesla “Full Self Driving” and it stunned me that there had by no means been any important progress on a category motion lawsuit round this. Nicely, I discovered in any other case yesterday.

Earlier than I get to that, although, I believe it’s vital to elucidate why a lawsuit appears legitimate and even extremely seemingly. I’ve by no means given lots of weight to the concept that folks shopping for Tesla Full Self Driving (FSD) thought they may flip FSD on and fall asleep whereas the automobile drives itself the day they purchased it. I do assume a number of folks might have thought so, as a result of they didn’t comply with the tech intently and didn’t take note of the wonderful print, simply the title — however I’ve all the time figured there are sufficient disclaimers in place that such an argument isn’t very cheap. (That may be extra a case of the client not paying sufficient consideration — except they had been blatantly instructed one thing else in a retailer or on a check drive.)

Nonetheless, Elon Musk has made quite a lot of claims through the years in regards to the close to future which have been so absurdly false on reflection that it’s been a surprise that he didn’t get nailed in a category motion case due to them. For instance, he claimed in October 2016 {that a} Tesla would autonomously drive itself from Los Angeles to New York Metropolis by the tip of 2017. Somebody might have simply purchased Tesla FSD in November 2016 with the expectation it might do this in a yr. That was a transparent, simple, particular declare from the CEO of the corporate. Simply earlier than I purchased Tesla FSD in mid-2019, Musk had overrated how a lot the capabilities had been about to enhance, that “characteristic full” Full Self Driving can be applied by the tip of the yr, and stated varied issues about how the value of FSD would go up enormously, Tesla autos offered at the moment can be appreciating belongings, and Teslas would have the ability to make a ton of cash for his or her house owners pretty quickly in the event that they purchased FSD. I’ve made precisely $0 on my 2019 Mannequin 3 with FSD to this point, and I’m wondering what Tesla would say if I introduced it to a retailer at the moment demanding that they purchase the car off of me for greater than I spent on it as a result of it was going to be an appreciating asset and has FSD. Primarily based on Elon Musk’s feedback, ought to I’ve assumed FSD can be really full self driving by now and that I could possibly be working the automobile as a robotaxi, or ought to I’ve assumed the software program suite can be roughly ineffective for me for the approaching 6 and a half years (because it has been)? There are examples like these nearly yearly from Musk making big, daring claims about how quickly Tesla FSD can be working for actual.

As only one extra instance, there’s a well-known/notorious video from a few years in the past the place Tesla “demonstrated” full self driving, however really misled folks purposefully on what it might do on the time. Earlier at the moment, concerning that video, a commenter (Matthew Berg) wrote: “The primary time I heard of FSD was from a video the place they claimed the one cause there was a driver in any respect was for regulatory compliance. The caveat that you just needed to maintain your fingers on the wheel was in an finish be aware, written in a tiny font in a top-flight gray.” Certainly — they indicated the tech was far more succesful than it was and that they mainly simply wanted to do away with some pesky rules and folks might let the automobile drive itself for actual.

So, how have there not been any large class motion lawsuits on this?

Nicely, considered one of our readers, “Matthew2312,” talked about simply such a case (or, extra particularly, mixed instances) a few days in the past within the feedback on one other article — LoSavio and Matsko v Tesla. Asking for more information on that, he offered the next abstract from Google Gemini:

Govt Abstract of Standing (January 2026)

• Present Standing: Lively Class Motion (Licensed).
• Current Main Ruling: On August 18, 2025, U.S. District Decide Rita F. Lin granted LoSavio’s movement for sophistication certification.
• Attraction Pending: As of December 18, 2025, Tesla has filed a petition for permission to attraction this certification to the Ninth Circuit Court docket of Appeals (Docket No. 25-7927).
• Key Distinction: The court docket beforehand dominated (September 2023) that plaintiffs who signed Tesla’s arbitration settlement (together with Matsko) should settle disputes individually. LoSavio stays in federal court docket as a result of he efficiently argued he was not sure by these particular arbitration phrases.

Detailed Case Developments

1. Class Certification (August 2025)

Decide Lin’s August 2025 order licensed a category of Tesla house owners who bought autos based mostly on particular alleged misrepresentations concerning Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities. The court docket allowed the case to proceed on grounds of fraud and negligence, particularly specializing in two core classes of statements made by Tesla and CEO Elon Musk between October 2016 and August 2024:

• The “{Hardware} Assertion”: Claims that every one autos produced on the manufacturing facility contained the required {hardware} for full self-driving functionality (SAE Degree 5) pending solely software program validation.
• The “Cross-Nation Assertion”: Claims {that a} Tesla car would quickly have the ability to drive itself autonomously from Los Angeles to New York with out human intervention.
• The court docket dismissed claims associated to breach of guarantee however permitted the fraud-based claims to maneuver ahead.

2. Discovery and Proof (2025)

All through 2025, the plaintiffs gained key discovery disputes.

• Deposition of Management: In April 2025, the court docket granted LoSavio’s movement to compel Elon Musk and Autopilot Director Ashok Elluswamy to function custodians for discovery. The court docket reasoned that as a result of Musk personally made most of the “Cross-Nation” statements, his direct information and communications had been related to establishing potential falsity or intent.
• {Hardware} Limitations: Plaintiffs have offered proof arguing that Tesla has not utilized for regulatory approval for SAE Degree 3+ autonomy in California, contradicting advertising claims that the automobiles had been “{hardware} prepared” for such capabilities.

3. Ninth Circuit Attraction (December 2025 – Current)

Tesla aggressively moved to dam the category certification.

• Submitting: In mid-December 2025, Tesla filed an interlocutory attraction to the Ninth Circuit.
• Mediation: A mediation questionnaire was filed on December 19, 2025, a regular procedural step within the Ninth Circuit to find out if a settlement is possible earlier than full appellate briefing.
• Timeline: If mediation fails, the attraction briefing schedule extends into Spring 2026, with Tesla’s opening transient due in March 2026.

Strategic Implications

This case is distinct from different Autopilot litigation (similar to wrongful dying fits) as a result of it assaults the financial damage of shoppers fairly than bodily security defects. The core argument is that buyers paid hundreds of {dollars} (e.g., for the FSD package deal) for performance that Tesla knew it couldn’t ship on the promised timeline, thereby artificially inflating the car’s worth.

As a result of Matsko was compelled to arbitration, the general public docket and high-profile rulings presently heart nearly totally on LoSavio.

After all, Google Gemini isn’t a lawyer, “Matthew2312” isn’t a lawyer, and I’m not a lawyer. (I did very effectively in all of my faculty and grad college regulation lessons, although, and am not stunned that the important thing statements that all the time hung in my head from Elon Musk are ones being centered on in these lawsuits.) If anybody studying it is a lawyer, particularly on this area of regulation, and wish to chime in with extra insights on this, I’d love that. Nonetheless, barring that, it appears to me {that a} important class motion lawsuit on Elon Musk’s FSD and robotaxi claims is shifting ahead by means of the system. I’m wondering if there can be any large information on this in 2026.