“Power Safety” Makes Us Much less Safe. Renewables Are The Reply

Help CleanTechnica’s work by way of a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

If there’s a lesson to be drawn from the horrific occasions within the Center East initiated by the corrupt authorities in Washington, it’s that the trail to peace is thru renewable power — not armaments, boots on the bottom, or “regime change.” Writing on The Local weather Brink on Substack, Andrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M, stated, “When individuals debate the price of fossil fuels versus renewables, the dialog virtually at all times facilities on the value on the pump or the fee per kilowatt-hour of your electrical energy invoice. That’s comprehensible — these are the prices you’ll be able to see — however they’re not the entire story.”

Dessler says the dialogue often focuses on subsidies for renewable power, however fossil fuels get huge subsidies as properly. They’re deeply hidden, nonetheless, as they’re unfold throughout authorities budgets, healthcare programs, and navy spending in methods most individuals can’t join again to their power decisions. To the extent that they do get consideration, most of it goes to the implicit subsidy for fossil fuels from local weather change and air air pollution, which economists have valued at trillions of {dollars} per 12 months.

Hidden Prices Of Fossil Fuels

“There’s one other hidden subsidy that few discuss — nationwide safety. As oil costs surge in response to US assaults on Iran, that price is unimaginable to disregard.” In accordance with Securing America’s Future Power, a nonpartisan nationwide safety group led by retired senior navy officers, about one fifth of your complete Division of Protection base price range exists, a minimum of partially, to maintain oil flowing by way of susceptible choke factors just like the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal, and delivery lanes within the South China Sea.

The US annually spends greater than $81 billion to guard the worldwide provide of oil, however that price doesn’t seem on the gasoline pump. That makes it a subsidy, paid for by taxpayers, which makes oil look cheaper than it really is. Unfold throughout all US oil consumption, it’s equal to about $11 per barrel — or about 28 cents per gallon — cash that’s hidden within the protection price range.

For a typical fill-up, that subsidy quantities to about $5.00, and that’s simply to be prepared for warfare, Dessler says. As soon as the taking pictures begins, the prices go up exponentially. The 2003 Iraq Battle’s price was estimated to be $3 trillion, which interprets to just about $10,000 per US citizen. Dessler says:

“Once you add all of it up, fossil fuels should not low-cost. They’ve by no means been low-cost. We’ve simply been sensible at hiding the prices — within the protection price range, in emergency rooms, in FEMA catastrophe reduction, and so forth. And it’s not simply the price of combating the warfare. Regardless of trillions spent defending world oil routes, we are going to at all times be economically susceptible to disruption in oil provides.

“Why? As a result of oil is a globally priced commodity, which means everybody pays the identical worth. When one thing disrupts provide wherever on this planet, costs go up in every single place, together with the US. This occurs regardless of the USA being the most important oil producer on this planet.

“We noticed this play out in actual time simply final week. Following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, oil costs surged. Fuel costs are following. And this was earlier than the battle escalated to straight threaten the Strait of Hormuz, by way of which roughly 20 % of the world’s petroleum and LNG flows day by day.

“Fossil gasoline pushers don’t need you to grasp this. And so they significantly don’t need you to acknowledge that the value of photo voltaic power and wind power isn’t affected by occasions within the Center East [emphasis added]. A missile strike on Iranian oil infrastructure has zero impact on the price of producing electrical energy from a photo voltaic panel in Texas or a wind turbine in Iowa. The ‘gasoline’ — daylight and wind — is free, home, and geopolitically inert.”

Geopolitical Dangers

One of many major explanation why China is pushing electrical automobiles so strongly with authorities coverage is that it imports most of its oil, which has opened it to huge geopolitical threat. Electrical automobiles charged by photo voltaic power are an vital method for China to handle the nationwide safety issues created by fossil fuels, Dessler says.

“In lots of elements of the nation and world, photo voltaic and wind are actually the most cost effective sources of latest electrical energy era — not due to subsidies however as a result of the underlying economics have shifted irreversibly. Renewable power is the one credible path to power and financial safety. Drill, child, drill is a fantasy — and an costly one. Extra drilling means extra ache, no more safety.”

The unprovoked assault on Iran has lower the world off from LNG. Liquefied pure gasoline from Qatar was a protected power wager for nations throughout Europe and Asia, however now they face an power disaster. On March 5, 2026, Qatar shut down LNG manufacturing at a facility in Doha after Iranian assaults focusing on power installations, chopping off nations from India to Italy from a vital power supply and doubtlessly growing prices for key industries in the USA.

“It’s price pausing to understand what fossil fuels made potential. They powered our civilization for the final 200 years. However the transition to renewable power isn’t a rejection of that legacy. It’s the subsequent chapter and a greater one,” Dessler contends.

Krugman On Renewables & Power Safety

Paul Krugman agrees. In his Substack put up on March 6, 2026, he wrote that by attacking Iran, the deranged US president made a powerful case for renewable power, not as a result of it does much less harm to the surroundings however as a result of dependence on fossil fuels is a menace to nationwide safety. “In a harmful world, it’s infinitely safer to depend on the solar and the wind than to depend upon fossil fuels that have to be transported lengthy distances, from nations which might be untrustworthy, typically exploitative, and situated in areas that regularly devolve into warfare zones.”

Anybody with a fourth grade schooling ought to be capable to comprehend Krugman’s argument, and but most of these main the US authorities can’t. “The present state of affairs within the Center East is actually the worst-case situation for world power provides. Usually round 20 % of the world’s oil provide transits by way of the Strait of Hormuz. It’s additionally a vital route for cargo of liquefied pure gasoline and fertilizer. That passage is now successfully closed and there aren’t any good options. Oil trade specialists predict that the squeeze on oil provides will grow to be rather more extreme if the Strait isn’t re-opened inside a number of days.”

Krugman notes that whereas the value of oil has elevated, the value of gasoline has gone up rather more shortly. Are oil firms benefiting from the state of affairs to extract further income? What do you suppose?

The so-called US president — in his lucid moments — rails towards renewable power, in all probability as a result of the fossil gasoline trade has so generously supported his lunacy for their very own personal profit. However Krugman urged the UK and different European nations have to be wishing they had been getting an excellent bigger share of their power from renewables fairly than pure gasoline, which might free them each from the idiocy of Trump’s delusions and the Center East warfare.

Decisions

Writing within the Monetary Instances this week, Alan Beattie places power coverage within the context of geopolitical rivalry by saying the competing positions of the financial superpower are:

• From the US you get pressured into commerce offers promising a way forward for burning fossil fuels whose worth is topic to wildly damaging US adventurism.
• From China you get reliably low-cost EVs and inexperienced tech to generate renewables.

Krugman provides, “The issue with calls for that nations ‘burn, child, burn’ isn’t simply American adventurism. It’s additionally the truth that counting on the USA for LNG, which is what doing issues Trump’s method would quantity to, is itself unsafe. Are you certain that Trump or a Trump-like future president received’t lower off power provides to nations that annoy him? I’m not.

“So the US warfare towards Iran is making a powerful case for nations around the globe to hunt power independence. And for these nations that don’t have massive fossil gasoline reserves, which means wind and photo voltaic (and, sure, nuclear.) Donald Trump, hero of renewable power? Who knew?”

The underside line for Krugman is the previous regulation of unintended penalties. Or put one other method, “Watch out what you would like for, you simply may get it.” Renewables equal power safety. Fossil fuels equal somebody at all times has a knee in your neck. What do you suppose is a greater long-term technique for you and your group?