Op-Ed: E-Trike Security Is Actual — However the Failure Runs Deeper than the Autos

---

Help CleanTechnica’s work by way of a Substack subscription or on Stripe.


Or help our Kickstarter marketing campaign!

---

---

In my earlier articles, be it reportage or opinion, I appeared to have taken the facet of full opposition. A motoring journalist buddy identified how the actual concern is security. I partly agreed with him however argued that if we have a look at street security in different nations it’s a for much longer course of than simply banning automobiles.

I emphasised that security considerations surrounding electrical tricycles and e-bikes in Philippine cities are actual.

Anybody who has frolicked driving, commuting, and even observing visitors from a bus window in Metro Manila (or Metro Cebu, like Larry Evans has) has seen it firsthand. Poor lane self-discipline, unpredictable maneuvers, automobiles coming into high-speed roads with out clear signaling, and riders who seem unfamiliar with primary street guidelines should not uncommon.

However specializing in rider conduct alone misses the deeper downside. The protection concern round e-trikes will not be merely about reckless driving or “undisciplined” customers. It’s the cumulative results of regulatory gaps, weak product requirements enforcement, fragmented public schooling, and the absence of a long-term imaginative and prescient for electrical mobility.

In brief, what appears to be like like a street security downside is definitely a governance downside.

Uncontrolled entry earlier than regulation caught up

The mass arrival of e-bikes and e-trikes within the Philippines didn’t comply with a coordinated nationwide plan. Imports surged quickly, pushed by low-cost manufacturing overseas and robust native demand for reasonably priced mobility. Regulation, nonetheless, lagged behind adoption.

On the heart of this hole are overlapping mandates among the many Division of Transportation (Division of Transportation), the Division of Commerce and Trade (Division of Commerce and Trade), and the Land Transportation Workplace (Land Transportation Workplace).

The DTI is answerable for product requirements, import regulation, and shopper safety. The DoTR units transport coverage and security frameworks. The LTO handles registration, classification, and enforcement. In concept, this division ought to have ensured that electrical trikes coming into the market met minimal technical and security requirements earlier than being allowed on public roads.

In follow, giant volumes of e-trikes entered the nation earlier than clear classifications, efficiency limits, or design necessities had been absolutely enforced. Questions that ought to have been settled early had been left unanswered. Ought to all e-trikes require registration? Which items wanted an Import Commodity Clearance? What technical thresholds outlined an e-trike versus an electrical bike? These ambiguities created a regulatory vacuum that importers, sellers, and patrons navigated on their very own.

By the point clearer guidelines emerged, a whole lot of 1000’s of automobiles had been already in each day use.

Product requirements had been handled as secondary

From a product security perspective, the state of affairs is equally uneven. Many e-trikes on Philippine roads lack primary options which can be commonplace in different car lessons. Aspect mirrors are sometimes lacking or poorly positioned. Lighting programs range broadly in brightness and reliability. Battery enclosures differ in high quality, with some items exhibiting minimal safety in opposition to warmth, water ingress, or impression.

The DTI’s product requirements framework, together with necessities for Import Commodity Clearance and compliance labeling, exists on paper. However enforcement has been inconsistent, notably for low-cost imports bought by way of casual channels. Because of this, automobiles with vastly completely different construct high quality and security traits share the identical roads.

This issues as a result of car design shapes conduct. Poor visibility encourages unsafe merging. Weak braking programs lengthen stopping distances. Insufficient battery safety raises hearth dangers in dense city settings. When requirements are free or erratically enforced, street security turns into depending on particular person warning quite than system design.

Schooling was by no means scaled with adoption

Highway schooling is one other lacking layer. Many e-trike drivers come from casual transport backgrounds or are first-time car operators. Formal coaching packages, licensing pathways, and clear working guidelines weren’t scaled alongside the speedy progress of the sector.

The result’s a mismatch. Drivers are anticipated to navigate advanced, car-dominated street environments with out the identical stage of coaching required of different motorized vehicle operators. This isn’t distinctive to e-trikes, however the concern is amplified as a result of these automobiles typically function at decrease speeds and with restricted protecting options.

Observers typically describe this as a “self-discipline downside.” In actuality, it’s an schooling downside compounded by regulatory ambiguity. When guidelines are unclear, enforcement is inconsistent, and coaching is optionally available, unsafe conduct turns into systemic quite than distinctive.

The absence of a nationwide e-mobility imaginative and prescient

Underlying all of this can be a bigger concern: the Philippines by no means articulated a transparent, early imaginative and prescient for electrical mobility on the light-vehicle stage.

Coverage discussions round EVs have largely centered on vehicles, buses, and charging infrastructure, typically modeled on developed-market transitions. Mild electrical automobiles — regardless of being probably the most accessible, reasonably priced, and broadly adopted EVs within the nation — had been handled as peripheral or short-term.

With no imaginative and prescient, planning grew to become reactive. Roads weren’t redesigned to accommodate combined speeds. Automobile lessons had been outlined after deployment quite than earlier than. Enforcement arrived with out transition. Security was addressed by way of restriction quite than system enchancment.

Different nations that efficiently built-in mild electrical automobiles adopted a unique path. They outlined technical requirements early, invested in protected or shared lanes, educated riders, and steadily enforced guidelines as soon as alternate options existed. The Philippine strategy inverted this sequence.

Security requires programs, not shortcuts

The present debate round e-trike security typically facilities on whether or not these automobiles belong on main roads. That query, whereas necessary, is incomplete. The extra elementary concern is whether or not establishments ready the system to soak up a brand new mode of mobility in any respect.

E-trikes didn’t fail the street. The street system, regulatory framework, and coverage imaginative and prescient did not evolve in time.

If security is really the purpose, the answer is not going to come from bans alone. It can come from coordinated requirements between the DoTR, DTI, and LTO, from enforced product necessities, from rider schooling scaled to precise utilization, and from a nationwide imaginative and prescient that treats mild electrical mobility as a everlasting a part of the transport ecosystem quite than a brief disruption.

Till then, security will stay a priority — not as a result of e-trikes exist, however as a result of the system round them by no means caught up.